IT'S SO RARE TO HEAR AN INTELLIGENT QUESTION.

Last night's Question Time fielded what we can call 'An Eleven' team. We had to tolerate the obvious headline questions until a bright young man posed one on the concerns regarding teenage sex, subsequently, in many cases, leading to pregnancy and over the year, an army of offspring; the annual turnover appears to be a nominal 43,000. Many of the these would have been terminated by abortion, a legalised death penalty. If ever one wants to see politicians of all complexions close ranks, metaphorically licking each other, this type of question is ideal to smoke them out. Not one of the panel could give a positive answer, a proper answer that is. How much does this cost the diminishing taxpayer GB?

As long as we have people in politics who keep sucking up to the benefit scroungers, we'll not get out of this financial hole we have dug for ourselves.

The answer is that we cancel all these benefits, having pointed out previously, the responsibillity must lie with both sets of gandparents.







MOST CERTAINLY NOT WITH THE AUTHOR OF THIS ITEM.

THE SLIPPERY SLOPE TO DISASTER.

It is difficult to comprehend where Britain is heading. It has now gone beyond the pale. This weeks coverage of a non Brit., Binyam Mohamed, particularly by the BBC, could give us the impression that it is a Royal moment or at least some Head of state. This character, returning here rather than to his own country, Ethiopia, soaking up our hard earned cash in the way of benefits. If any indigenous UK citizen had a CV similar to his, I'm sure a prison sentence would be the outcome. How can this happen in a once stable and logical nation that was Britain?

In a recent conversation with an acquaintance, I learned something startling regarding a person headhunted from Eastern Europe to fill a gap in the NHS. He is an Arab who rarely ceases to further the cause of groups such as the likes of Hamas. He advocates death to all Jews and, when that is complete, they can start eradicating the Christians. We should be making enquiries about the method of vetting these people. He is in receipt of a three figure salary, again from our taxes. From this he will have plenty of surplus to help fund anti -British activity. An interesting aspect of this unsavoury person is that he has never been to Israel or Palestine, as he calls it.


WE ARE BOTH MORALLY AND ECONOMICALLY BANKRUPT.

TOXIC DEBT, PHASE II.

As this shambles of a Government flounders on the rocks of it's own making, it continues to stack up the mammoth debt for our children and grandchildren. The latest scam being to encourage mortgage lending by the state owned 'Toy town bank', Northern Rock, by throwing a further £14 billion pounds at it, with a view to offering 90% home loans in a desperate attempt to kick start a housing boom. You may remember that Brown considers stamp duty on property purchase a type of productivity. The drop in sales of homes has proved devastating to this economic simpleton. This of course flies in the face of the more prudent mortgage suppliers who have to endeavour to survive by relying on investors funds and are offered little in return because of disgracefully low interest rates. This clown will do anything to push the day of reckoning further down the road. What he fails to understand is, that markets, like liquid, will always find their own level.

It is important that he, Brown, must face the music before making his escape to somewhere like Brussels, when removed from office. I still want his pension pot, plus those of his sidekicks. What about you?







BETWEEN A ROCK (NORTHERN) AND A HARD PLACE.

RPI. OR CPI. BROWN'S DILEMMA.

We're not referring to resting in peace here, more to do with conning the punters about inflation. Six years ago the former Chancellor removed mortgage repayments from the instrument against which was calculated the inflation rate. This was known as the Retail Price Index. Brown's excuse was that we should be more aligned with Europe regarding the assessment of inflation. This is virtually impossible because, on the continent, fewer people purchase their own homes. By introducing the Consumer Price Index, we were supposed to feel much better off. It is inevitable that many people would be taken in by this sleight of hand.

We are, however, going to reach a point in the future when all the bargains become history and inflation will appear like an uncontrollable apparition. Should Brown still be around at this point he will want to reinstate mortgage repayments, as they will be in the doldrums for the unforseeable future.





WE HOPE HIS WRIGGLING DAYS ARE OVER

IS BROWN GOING RUSTY?

Our former Iron Chancellor, currently doing a short season as a 'Tin Pot' Prime Minister, is beginning to look a little off colour. We shall probably see less of him for awhile until he has had the opportunity to rub shoulders with Barack Obama in the Spring. Before what he hopes to be a life saving event, he appears to be making another appearance at the Vatican, surely not by popular request! Confession alone could take weeks, following his 'laundry list' of broken promises. This could well be followed by round the clock 'Hail Marys'', until the next election.









NONE OF THIS WILL BE PRETTY.

BROWN CONSIDERS CALLING IN MUGABE.

As the UK economy heads for the buffers, our PM is thinking about calling on the services of part time President of Zimbabwe, Robert Mugabe, as he is well practised in the art of 'quantitative easing', a wool over the eyes term for printing excess money. We should all wonder where the committee members, who set interest rates and generally make decisions to keep the economy on track, spend their time between the monthly meetings. It has been obvious for well over ten years that they can't possibly be involved in economics, otherwise we would all be better off.



The term 'quantitative easing' must roll off the tongue of politicians rather like peas off a drum, hoping that the public in general will except such jargon as the direction to take. To some folk the expression could mean, for example, a sex change or perhaps a form of battling obesesity. If it walks like a duck etc., we call it by it's proper name.











THIS PROBLEM IS NOT GOING AWAY.

SOCIALISM AND THE IMMORAL MAZE.

In a week when we are made aware of a population explosion created by backward teenagers, leaving taxpayer GB to pick up, unchecked, even more tabs, let us pause and digest what is going on here. Children as young as thirteen producing offsprings to add to the aim of the great socialist family, paid for by the more responsible (mostly non-socialist) faction of our morally and financially bankrupt society.

We can add to this the disgraceful actions of the minister in charge of law and order, Home Secretary, Jacqui 'I'm a happy hippie' Smith, who enjoys a cavalier approach to the Westminster game of 'guess which is my main residence'. The writer wishes to claim Buckingham Palace as a second home!

All these activities are representative of the 'Pinko' faction, none of whom could hold down a proper job but know how to swell their income by fleecing the public.









THEY WERE OF COURSE VOTED IN BY THE 'SOMETHING FOR NOTHING' BRIGADE.

NOW THERE'S A SURPRISE!

In the past year we have been served by domestic television keeping us well informed on the financial situation. The so called 'whistle blower', former employee of HBOS Paul Moore, in charge of risk, has been mentioned in dispatches more than once, featured in these documentaries explaining how Sir James Crosby, former 'top banana' of the bank in question, did not like the song that Moore was singing. This was blowing Brown's master plan of recycling credit right out of the water. Furthermore, it was getting in the way of bonuses for bank executives. This sleight of hand by Crosby was spotted by our former Chancellor who realised that here was a 'con artist' suitable for his sideshow, the Financial Services Authority (FSA). This shambolic outfit which was the smoke screen put into place in the early days of New Labour, to put the Bank of England off the scent. Previous postings have detailed this 'scam' on numerous occasions.

Although it has always been clear that our PM has constantly lied regarding the state of the economy, there is now no hiding place for him. The group that prefer politicians to lie will still be around, but even this forlorn and ever dwindling group will soon find it difficult to raise a quorum.









SO WILL BROWN NOW APOLOGIZE?

THE CZECHS AND A SNAKE IN THE GRASS FROM BRUSSELS.

The writer is indebted to Peter Hitchens' article in the MoS (8/2/09), an indepth discourse on the Czech position towards the EU. Students of history will be aware of the country's short history since being freed from the Austro-Hungarian empire following WWI, through the majority of the 20th. century until 1989. Most of this time living under dictatorships from foreign countries. Even under those vile oppressive regimes there was always a hope of a return to self determination. This they hoped would be easy, clasped to the bosom of the European Project. Fortunately for them, some of the older, wiser politicians are tossing up cautionary flares; Although the Republic currently holds the rotating EU presidency, The Czech President, Vaclav Klaus won't even have the EU flag flying over the most official of their country's buildings. They are naturally afraid of being steamrollered by unelected beaurocrats from HQ. Brussels have sent a 'hit man' to visit upon Klaus and threaten him that he must sign up to the Lisbon Treaty, or as the Irish see it, The Constitution. Enter the snake: Cohn-Bendit, former red anarchist, anti Gaullist, whose platform was the freedom to enter female accommodation at college/university. A red in your bed rather than under it. This was front line danger at it's deadliest. Meanwhile his contemporary, Vaclav Klaus, has always fought against real oppression. Cohn-Bendit now flies under a flag of convenience, the Green Party. If he were not Jewish we could envisage a kind of Christmas decoration. The Czechs have, we suspect, been hoping that the UK would ride to it's rescue, backing it's democratic longing.





SOME HOPE! (For more on Cohn-Bendit, visit Google)

'QUESTION TIME' - PLUS COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR.

As ever, last night's 'Question Time' was loaded with a cast from the 'central pool'. It's such a pity that they can't include at least one proper person weekly. After all, politics and their affect on the public is what it is all about. Following the obvious questions on this weeks topics, including one on the average Brits response to the snow, we had the usual mixture of answers, both responsible and irresponsible. No one was brave enough to vilify the nation over it's inherent laziness. Unsurprisingly, an employer in the audience mentioned that, of her workforce, only the foreigners showed up. The thing that concerned the writer most was a dim aside from a school teacher, who warned in best soothsaying form, that with the advancing 'global warming' we can expect more of these harsh winters, almost as though the UK had been singled out for this and future treatment. I'm sure that most of us are well aware of the awful weather currently around the Mediterranean Sea. The disaster is that this educationalist is brainwashing a generation of schoolchildren. I wonder if she would bet her pension on her theory, for theory is all it is.




Are there only a few sceptics including Dr. David Bellamy and myself who understand the folly of this new religion?










BALACLAVA KNITTING CLASSES ARE NOW AVAILABLE.

BARACK AND THE BUFFERS.

Obama shouldn't be too concerned with his ongoing problems to complete his staff, having earned his 'bones' in what is probably the sleaziest state in the union, Illinois. The latest set back, a 'double whammy', seems to be the withdrawal of Tom Daschle and Nancy Killefer from the posts of Health and Human Resources Secretary and Chief Performance Officer respectively, both of which could have been advertised in the Guardian. Both their offences are concerned with unpaid taxes. If there is something strange about this, new Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner was approved even after admitting owing thousands to the IRS. We wonder what he has on his boss.









CANCELLING THE NEXT FIXTURE IS NOT AN OPTION.

AND THE WINNER OF THE BBC 'STOOLIE' OF THE MONTH IS - - - - - - - -

It is quite disheartening that public funded institutions such as the BBC and the NHS have time and money (ours) to be vindictive towards employees who, evidently, are not allowed any privacy. We are obviously referring here to two particular incidents this week, one concerning Carol Thatcher for the unclear remark made to a colleague, the other regarding a nurse offering a prayer to a patient.


I can imagine to a man, using the term loosely, any BBC manager/executive would have to pause and spit every time having spoken the name. This from the outfit that excuses the 'on air' disgraces of Ross and company - - - - - -, (the writer had to spit). In addition, hardly mentioned in any newscast, the arrogant remarks from the weasel in the House of Lords, Lord Meddlesome, that British workers should chance their arm on the continent. The Beeb would still refer to Lord Tebbitt's 'on your bike' comment, ahead of Mandy's outrageous suggestion.


Both institutions in question have become laws unto themselves. We have to consider independent public committees, non political, overseeing both bodies.









NEW NATIONAL CURRICULUM TO INCLUDE 'SECRET POLICING'

LATEST: LARK RISE/CANDLEFORD, DESIGNATED NEW ECO-TOWN.

Dorcas was disturbed to hear of the Government's proposal, nevertheless she was soon on the case, enquiring about there being a suitable number of affordable homes, along with a fully integrated transport system. The BBC is happy for the changeover, as long as a clause regarding at least 50% imported labour is included. They prefer the aggravation, which then gives them added value to their newscasts.





ALL THINGS ARE POSSIBLE WITH THIS GOVERNMENT.

ON THE SKIDS IN DAVOS.

We understand that our intrepid leader has suggested we should use a kind of universal sat-nav to avoid problems in the future. This kind of spouting is akin to locking the door after the horse has bolted. The rhetoric was obviously aimed at the other clueless band of national leaders, in a vain effort to impress. The problem with Brown is that he can't get it into his head, that we should have been going down this route since the late 90's. Unfortunately, the rest of the world would have to be half-baked to follow any model created by a socialist. We could only approach an agreement with a view to a freedom not possible within the limitations of socialism, a freedom to take control of our own expenditure.

People have an obsession with voting for a clown whose promises can't be delivered either side of the Atlantic, as supporters of Barack Obama will eventually learn. The latter certainly won't follow in the wake of suggestions dreamt up by Brown. Irrespective of a Bruce Springsteen song, the world is not the 'oyster' of recording artists or film stars, who seem to follow a leftish bias, presumably due to the fact that they think that they are dependent upon on the 'something for nothing brigade'. Strangely enough, I have just read a biography of Hoagy Carmichael, explaining in great detail his resentment of left wing dreams by the likes of Humphrey Bogart, that are impossible to materialise. We are never all going to be the same. A recommendation would be: Just be happy in your skin!







LICKING THE SUBJECT WON'T RID US OF THIS DOWNTURN.

A DICTATORSHIP VIA THE LORDS.

During the past week two important statements were made from the House of Lords, one outlining assistance for the motor industry, the other was the drivel about every household obliged to have 'Broadband' within a few years. This obviously includes all affordable homes, to be included in an eco-town coming to a green field site near you. As explained previously, such homes being affordable, since the rest of us happen to be paying for them.


Ken Clarke should get Black Rod to knock on next door and enquire if Mandy can come out to play. Any expenditure of tax payers' money should, by law, be made in the Commons, where it can be properly debated.








REMIND ME! WHAT IS DEMOCRACY?