Remember the notion of 'government for the people by the people'? If so, then why don't we spend more time considering it. Time will now be more abundant to most of us following the cessation of the great credit card abusing season which has drawn to a close.
We could draw up an endless list and all the following subjects have been covered in previous postings, albeit independent of each other.
Let us repeat 'government for the people etc' Do not accept government by the Government as an option.
1. Size of Government at all levels, be it national or local and including quangos. All to be reduced in size to about one third.
Reason: If business and commerce can reduce it's staff because of IT, then so must Government. Rubber stamping laws passed in Brussels by unelected personnel, which makes up approx 80% of our legislative process, does not require hundreds of MP's plus their armies of aides. At a local level there are now hundreds of thousands of non jobs, created in the main by more inane EU legislation. If these laws are good for us then the outfits concerned should operate privately, selling their services to us, if we consider them to be appropriate. The choice has to be ours.
2. MP's income and expenses have to be determined by independent bodies.
Reason: In a previous recommendation we considered this to be the responsibility of the MP's constituency, which we have now established will be much larger. The overheads to suit local economy. This will soon sort out the vocational politician from the 'Gravy surfer'.
3. Size of population to be limited to a figure agreed with taxpayer GB.
Reason: It is preposterous to allow a Government to let in millions of unwanted people, many of whom will be living off the rest of us. At the end of each parliament we need to assess the comparative figure with that of the previous one, should this be greater than the figure agreed, then charges need to be brought to that Government responsible, who will have to pay personal fines.
4. Doing what the majority wants. Which means asking regularly.
Reason: In the Labour manifesto for the 2005 General election, most of us are aware of the promise made regarding the EU constitution. (Manifesto; according to the Oxford dictionary, means that it is a statement on future policy.) That only applies, presumably, when it isn't embarrassing to a group who covet positions in this fraudulent masquerade of a controlling body. All the major parties suffer from this syndrome: professing to be 'listening'. That may be so, but they only listen to Brussels and not to the folk who pay. This we must deem as one of the great crimes against democracy. In government, lying to the public has to be treated as the ultimate sin. Punishment: the sequestration of the offending party's pension fund. A state of war might have exemptions.
The Pitfalls: These controls regarding performance of our MP's can only be administered by an honest judiciary, obviously we can't trust one that considers Brussels. Whoever we decide to run this 'puritanical' system would also have to be vetted closely, with regular changes of personnel on all sides. We must not fall for 'the jobs for the boys and girls'.
WE REPEAT: 'THIS IS A MAGNA CHARTA MOMENT'