comparethemarxist.com
Around a year ago, Channel 4 screened the Martin Durkin documentary on the UK's projected National Debt. At the time, it was a nominal £4.8 trillion. During this excellent 90 minutes of sensible television, Durkin spoke with Brendan 'The Demon' Barber of the TUC; what a shallow, dim character he is. He is, of course, enjoying centre stage currently trying to convince hard working folk in the private sector that they should all work much longer to keep his members happy. He, incidentally, is the best excuse for not increasing the number of grammar schools, if he is a typical example of what they turn out. Furthermore, don't expect a haircut on the 30th. of Nov.
The other villain of the piece: serwotka.com. I'm sure Which Magazine would agree, that this model stuck firmly in reverse can only waste taxpayer GB's hard earned cash, who also pay the incomes of the TUC's workplace representatives; because the more services it has, the more it needs.
Ask yourselves, all of you socialists who earn your living in the private sector. How can a group of Public Sector employees, based only on a vote of 30%, be allowed to disrupt the lives of so many? Furthermore, Barber considers the Prime Minister's response to the potential loss of earnings, along with a cost to the economy, as simplistic. This coming from someone who doesn't need to get out of bed to guide his flock of sheep to withdraw their labour. What is so disturbing, however, is that the modern generation of headteachers, in showing complete ignorance of economics, wish to join the inaction.
THERE IS LITTLE HOPE FOR THE FUTURE.
The other villain of the piece: serwotka.com. I'm sure Which Magazine would agree, that this model stuck firmly in reverse can only waste taxpayer GB's hard earned cash, who also pay the incomes of the TUC's workplace representatives; because the more services it has, the more it needs.
Ask yourselves, all of you socialists who earn your living in the private sector. How can a group of Public Sector employees, based only on a vote of 30%, be allowed to disrupt the lives of so many? Furthermore, Barber considers the Prime Minister's response to the potential loss of earnings, along with a cost to the economy, as simplistic. This coming from someone who doesn't need to get out of bed to guide his flock of sheep to withdraw their labour. What is so disturbing, however, is that the modern generation of headteachers, in showing complete ignorance of economics, wish to join the inaction.
THERE IS LITTLE HOPE FOR THE FUTURE.