BOYS WON'T BE BOYS.

For as long as this regime (promenading as a government) has existed, the only things in which it has succeeded is the destruction of the economy and the messy 'dogs breakfast' of so called 'diversity'. The latter is now causing a farrago in the Anglican church. Whilst Headquarters pursues the dead end of political correctness, the conservative more mature wing, mainly from abroad, appears to view Canterbury's wishy washy approach quite abhorrent. What makes an institution such as the Church of England display itself in similar fashion to either a soap opera or a football team, wanting seemingly to play to the gallery rather than maintaining it's appeal to the traditional worshipper? I'm convinced that we are entering extremely dangerous waters here; didn't we, after all, spread the gospel according to the Anglican view, apparently now to fine tune it to comply with infantile legislation of our over paid MPs? The observant will notice that the same situation has manifested itself within our police force. The government picks a head for these institutions with a prerequisite androgynous requirement, which throws their charges into complete confusion. This can have a knock on effect, trickling down to junior C of E school level for example, which Westminster would rid the nation of at the drop of a hat, presumably due to their success rate. PARENTS BEWARE!




My argument is not one of a strict homophobe, I happen to delight at a good tune , many of which were written by songwriters of a diverse sexuality. This does not, however, suggest that we rearrange the Bible to suit our latest whim. I have read more than once the comment that, if we don't support our traditional religion we'll be obliged to support another. It is high time that the Archbishop of Canterbury thought very seriously about this.




As a footnote, surely we can see how these current practices are very much at odds with Islam.