THE NIGHTMARE TICKET

So 'Thoroughly Modern' has broken cover in the Guardian or was it the Beano? 'T.M', as we already know, is one of the 'Marxist Brothers', he is Dummo and the younger one Loco. We are led to believe that the move is to put 'Sitting Bull' back onto the correct socialist course, which should get us into greater debt. I wonder what the little simpleton has in mind? His political career so far hasn't benefited the electorate at all. In '97 he was a sidekick to the new incumbent in No.10, the name slips my memory temporarily. He was, naturally, one of the gang who set us on the downward slope to obscurity and virtual bankruptcy. Eventually, aspiring to follow Margaret Beckett around from one department to another, initially at Defra where he compounded her inability to manage the allocation of farming subsidies, which culminated in heavy fines by the EU. This is our money to which we refer. A political lightweight with no experience of the business world and who sports a degree in Politics and Philosophy, this man is not fit for high office. A true playgroup politician.





The other half of the duff duo is 'Postman Pat', who is currently curing the nation, keeping MRSA and C dif. at bay. A natural progression from a post round and union duties. How can this be any better than the clowns that we have been obliged to endure for the last eleven years?





YOU'VE NOT GOT TO BE ON ELM STREET

A CHEATING BEEB

When the BBC cheats, the penalty should be a percentage drop at the next licence review.



OTHERWISE THE LICENCE PAYER PICKS UP THE CHARGE.

A LICENCE TO KILL

"Do you take this man to be your lawful wedded target"? Although it is thoroughly abhorrent for a man to harm a woman, particularly one's wife. What makes it acceptable for a woman to physically attack her husband? Knives and guns are great levellers in the hands of either. Can we expose this 'red herring' for what it is? Harriett Harwoman which, incidentally,has become a far better pseudonym than Harperson, as she appears now to be running with only the fair sex in mind.

Could this be her pitch, since she currently has the key of the door to No.10? How can anybody be so retarded not to see the abuse that such a law would create. The lawyers would love it of course, as another layer of legislation would give them more opportunities, all adding to a bill picked up by the tax payer. Unfortunately, this would see a proliferation of spouses held on trumped up charges.

Such legislation no doubt has the backing of 'Guardian' readers, particularly those who support the acidic attacks of Julie Bindel of the Justice for Women outfit. Fortunately we are blessed with plenty of the fair sex who see things from a more logical perspective. Erin Pizzey has spoken clearly against such a move, pointing out that there are plenty of attacks on men by their wives/ partners. This blog is not to defend any wrong doing but only a 'dimwit' would be unable to see the problem.

Talking of 'dimwits' brings us back to Harwoman again; she being the one responsible for having one of the few Labour MPs who thinks clearly, namely Frank Field, who lost his commission in the early days of this play group of a government for wanting to grasp the bull by the horns regarding the benefits system, but was roped in and disposed of by this incompetent silly woman. We did forewarn of this back in March.

NEW DEAL OR NO NEW DEAL.

It looks as though, even during the summer recess of parliament, we will have the usual sideshows continuing. A review of the benefits system (some hope). If the government lost all of recipients votes we would have Glasgow East plus all over the place. The cabinet, from their various summer vacation retreats, will huff and puff for a while before shelving the turkeys' equivalent of voting for christmas.



What is interesting is the total shambles of the 'child trust fund', which came into being in 2002. £250.00 per child to be invested against each birth, presumably upon application. That figure is now worth a little over £206.00 in 2002 terms. We can rest assured that the scheme is costing the tax payer a pretty penny.



DRUGS BARONS NEEDN'T GET EXCITED.

OUR SKIPPER'S EXCUSED FROM SCORING RUNS!

Over to Headingley Carnegie for the fourth day of the second 'test' against South Africa. The big news is that Benny Goodman isn't opening this year. England's captain, Sarah (Vaughan) has the usual pow-wow as soon they get onto the pitch, obviously having forgotten yet again things he should have mentioned in the changing room. "We'll dib, dib, dib...........we don't want to be thrashed by an innings but 10 wickets is OK. By the way, anybody that doesn't realise why Darren Pattinson is playing, it's to keep him from the Notts attack when they play Yorks tomorrow. After all he is currently amongst the best bowlers in the country. One other thing, if you young Broad think you can go on upstaging your team mates with the bat we will find excuses to drop you...........we'll dob,dob,dob"


The above suggested scenario culminated in humiliation, as all cricket lovers are now aware. We have in Vaughan the cricketing equivalent of Beckham or Brown, nobody knows how to get rid of him; the answer is simple, do what the Aussies would do, 'perform or go'. Well he certainly hasn't performed.


We have the same concern regarding a wicket keeper. The England coach, a former keeper himself will go to any length to avoid the best candidate in the land, if not the whole cricketing world. We have advised the An XI stump man of our local club to expect a call. Unfortunately Moores thinks that we automatically have an Adam Gilchrist in waiting, imagining that they grow on trees. The priority is to try and save as many runs as possible. England need someone who hovers over the sticks like a vulture.


As for Stuart Broad, it's obvious that your feet are troubling you, go back to your county and get back to good habits. Consider your time sacrosanct, not to be wasted chasing losers lost causes.

THE ECONOMIC CYCLE IN THE AGE OF CHANGE

So we were correct, Prudence is just next door's cat. Some of us realised this all along as suggested in an earlier post. Here we have the ultimate distorter of truths, who has painted himself into a corner and is now conniving to create a situation whereby any change of government will certainly be followed by increased taxation, due to the overburdening national debt running at more than the 40 billion benchmark; this is now approximately 10% above
when we include the Northern Rock/FSA debacle. The Thatcher government had to face this problem of course, which meant a leap in VAT, no matter how distasteful, something similar will have to happen again.



The continued temerity of this man 'incapability Brown' is mind boggling. Let us have a look at his record so far; hands on destruction of the economy, (remember his cv. 'ran christmas club at university')? Always moving the goalposts within a rather tattered economic cycle, ridding the nation of poverty (Labour needs poverty and a class war as constants, otherwise they are dead in the water), reneging on promises of a referendum followed by his underhand method of wanting to please his European masters. We can only suspect that he is lining up his future if and when he gets slung out 'neck and crop'.



Well I think is high time for voters to start applying the screws regarding politicians backing away from promises. We can ultimately insist on almost anything if we pull together, democracy can have cross party ideals, something that politicians will fight, to divide the electorate in order to remain in the driving seat, metaphorically speaking. Can't we therefore consider the option of sueing politicians/government who do not deliver on manifesto promises? We should ensure that they forfeit their pensions, this is our money remember, which in many cases is added to their 'shoe in' opportunities that await many of them on leaving Westminster. Let us see them trying to get a proper job, having played fast and loose with our hard earned taxes. Operating as side kicks to the far from democratic Brussels clique, both considerably over manned. Naturally all at our expense.

REST ASSURED 'SITTING BULL' WILL NEVER WEAR THE YELLOW JERSEY.

EVERYTHING TODAY IS THOROUGHLY MODERN (Van Heusen/Cahn)

'Thoroughly modern Miliband' has had his lack of understanding of the world exposed again this week. He can't make out why Russia and China are not going to agree to sanctions for Zimbabwe. How can this simpleton, from a marxist background, not understand the game.



He probably joined the party after failing to get a job as a mash lad.



FRIGHTENING! DON'T YOU THINK?

FIRST YOU PUT YOUR TWO KNEES CLOSE UP TIGHT.

Noticed a letter in the press today, with a recommendation to youngsters to say no to sex. It's far easier than that, we just stop sponsoring such activities via the overburdened tax payer. Just consider how much this irresponsibility costs us, without having a say in the matter; sex education, contraception (the queueing for the morning after pill is bound to get in the way of learning), hospital treatment for sexually transmitted deseases. Then consider why the government insists on covering our green fields with 'eco towns'. The wool is being pulled over our eyes, giving us the impression that 'eco' is to do with environmentle concerns, when it means being economical for the single parent families. All together: WE WANT OUR MONEY BACK!

Latest - CRIME FIGURES DOWN, MOON MADE OF CHEESE

It is high time that the tax and licence paying public started to look seriously at both the government and the BBC in tandem. Not only did 'Sitting Bull' furtively finalize the signing of the Lisbon treaty on Wednesday last, but the BBC, which appears to be getting out of public broadcasting, seemingly ignored it and chose to concentrate on lies on behalf of the government regarding crime figures. Jacqui 'I'm a happy hippie' was obviously over the 'cheese moon' with this well prepared list of totally misleading figures. Stephen Pollard, whose socialist credentials are well known, produced a list of statistics covering a far greater aspect of what is actually going on; here are a few areas ignored in the report. The British Crime Survey's numbers don't include victims 12 to 16 years of age. If a person experiences multiple crimes e.g. burglary, this would be the only one counted. Therefore, it rapidly becomes obvious that we are being sold a 'pig in a poke'. The day before, that's the day a Scotsman sold fifty million English nationals' birthright away, the 'Beeb' was boasting a scoop regarding forged documents, of which there could be thousands in circulation. If the police get around to arresting the perpetrator, rest assured that it will only be counted as one crime.





BEWARE THE WAY POLICE FIGURES ARE PRESENTED, THEY SEEM TO HIDE BEHIND THE WORD 'RECORDED'.







"Good night all"

WHY CAN'T ' MACK THE KNIFE' REMAIN JUST A SONG

I have pondered this subject for sometime, not wishing to offend any relatives of the victims. I can't however remain silent indefinitely. In discussion with a friend recently, we concluded that the media acts as an advert for these atrocities. The majority of the public are aware that this situation is out of control with no one wanting to identify the cause; if it were debated in parliament, 'bedwetters' versus logic, the former would still have the majority to act non-decisively. So how should we tackle it? For far too long we have allowed ourselves to be brow beaten by a government of limited intelligence, who wish to be in control of everything. This has made many of our communities lurch to the position of needing to be led by the nose. A rudderless motley crew unable to cope; no morality, decency, respect or any of the accepted qualities essential for a sound society. They, of course, know their rights and how to claim benefits. These, therefore, are all the ingredients to create this deadly mix which is now paramount on our streets.



Government has for far too long been gung ho with our taxes, creating the ludicrous situation of funding attacks upon ourselves. The C of E seems too ready to involve itself with 'Boys and Girls come out to play'. So how about doing something ourselves? Any suitable comments would be appreciated. We could eventually develop a new way of governing ourselves.



FROM SMALL ACORNS LARGE OAK TREES GROW!

CREDIT CRUNCH, THE NEWEST BREAKFAST CEREAL

SNAP! CRACKLE! and POP! along with the GNASHING of teeth as we read the financial section of the press over breakfast. The new breakfast sensation. We had better get used to the flavour as it will be ever present for a long time to come.

NEW LABOUR IS BAD FOR YOUR FINANCIAL HEALTH.

ALL THE COWGIRLS WANT TO MARRY HARRIET

Extraordinary how a politician (pause for laughter) Harperson, can spend our money attacking approximately half of the nation. She appears in the 'Commons' peddling her one person crusade endeavouring to side track much of the workforce, the Anglo Saxon male. It cannot be logical to suppress talent when an applicant for a position of employment has to overcome far more obstacles than some of the other contenders. Suitability along with talent should be the main requirements. I know of many a woman and members of the ethnic minorities, who are admirably capable, holding senior positions because they are good at their profession and for no other reason. Perhaps it is worth considering the words of psychologist and author Susan Pinker who points out in her writings, "The Sexual Paradox" that not all women wish to work. We need to respect that some women consider bringing up a young family to be more important, my daughter being one of the latter.



In closing, I see that 'Har-Har' has shelved the pursuance of the abortion legislation currently going through the 'house'. We can safely assume that this is so as not to offend the catholics of Glasgow East in the run up to the forthcoming by-election. Well done Celtic.



confused electorate.com

ISLAMABAD, OR IS IT GOOD?

According to press reports it would appear that our senior judge is contemplating allowing the practice of limited tenets of sharia law within our judicial system. One should beg the question if we have reciprocal arrangements with all the major islamic nations. Don't hold your breath.


We have, I'm sure, allowed such practices in the past. In the 90's a Glasgow MP was, according to reports, accused of misdemeanors involving his nomination application and a loan or gift of money, something that under British law would probably have been considered illegal. From what I recall sharia law deemed the money to be a gift and that was how it was settled.



The suggestion that we can have two separate systems of law running in tandem in limited areas can only bring about problems. In theory, this would appear in order; history however would suggest that the boundaries would be challenged regularly, with the law of the land being eroded little by little.

BOYS WON'T BE BOYS.

For as long as this regime (promenading as a government) has existed, the only things in which it has succeeded is the destruction of the economy and the messy 'dogs breakfast' of so called 'diversity'. The latter is now causing a farrago in the Anglican church. Whilst Headquarters pursues the dead end of political correctness, the conservative more mature wing, mainly from abroad, appears to view Canterbury's wishy washy approach quite abhorrent. What makes an institution such as the Church of England display itself in similar fashion to either a soap opera or a football team, wanting seemingly to play to the gallery rather than maintaining it's appeal to the traditional worshipper? I'm convinced that we are entering extremely dangerous waters here; didn't we, after all, spread the gospel according to the Anglican view, apparently now to fine tune it to comply with infantile legislation of our over paid MPs? The observant will notice that the same situation has manifested itself within our police force. The government picks a head for these institutions with a prerequisite androgynous requirement, which throws their charges into complete confusion. This can have a knock on effect, trickling down to junior C of E school level for example, which Westminster would rid the nation of at the drop of a hat, presumably due to their success rate. PARENTS BEWARE!




My argument is not one of a strict homophobe, I happen to delight at a good tune , many of which were written by songwriters of a diverse sexuality. This does not, however, suggest that we rearrange the Bible to suit our latest whim. I have read more than once the comment that, if we don't support our traditional religion we'll be obliged to support another. It is high time that the Archbishop of Canterbury thought very seriously about this.




As a footnote, surely we can see how these current practices are very much at odds with Islam.

IS THAT ONE OR TWO F***ING LUMPS SIR?

We can only assume that the student incorporating expletives in his GCSE examination paper will be, at some stage, in pole position for an executive post with Sir Alan Sugar.