TALKING FOM BOTH SIDES OF THE MOUTH SIMULTANEOUSLY.

The pathetic British Broadcasting Corporation was at it again this week. In their main national news slot, we were treated to a lengthy item regarding the demise of many of our natural species of wild life here in the UK. Many reasons were given for reduced numbers, the most absurd being the increase in temperature. Those of you living in the British Isles will be aware of the current appalling weather patterns, mainly cold and wet, with the occasional moderately sunny day. Their following weather forecast reflecting this misery.

The author is an avid reader of letters to the press; one such contribution this week from an Alasdair Maclean, Stourbridge, West Midlands, who lists weather variation over the last century or so. The following is an extract from the letter:

 'Our most brilliant English May was in 1909 with 327 hours at Greenwich observatory, followed by a plunge to a chilly grey June with only 106 hours sunshine at Greenwich. May 1922 had a blaze of heat with 91f on two days in London, but that year's summer obtained the undesired distinction of the wettest and coldest summer of the 20th. century.

May 1935 had a protracted spell of frosts, damaging crops and fruit. The 17th. of the month had widespread snow in England (echoed last week) with five inches of snow as far apart as Harrogate and Tiverton.

May 1956 was dry and much more congenial than the May of the previous year. However, during the summer, umbrellas were given far more exercise than bottles of suntan lotion. The rain poured and poured and August was one of coldest Augusts of the century. Cricketers groaned and complained with their repetitive frustrations.

The last three Mays of the Sixties, in 1967, '68 and '69, were notably wet in England and Wales. The summers that followed those three Mays were among the best of that decade, even though they did not attain the first-rank status for good weather like the summers of 1868, 1911, 1947, 1976 and 1995.'

I have a feeling that the complainants from these wildlife groups think, by mentioning the possibility of 'global warming', this should put them in line for government grants funded by taxpayer GB. The BBC loves this type of largesse.

ALTERNATIVELY, COULD OVER-POPULATION BE THE PROBLEM?

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WAS ALWAYS GOING TO CAUSE PROBLEMS.

Here in England, in recent months, we have witnessed revelations from the trials of men running sex gangs. Muslim men procuring young white girls, mostly from the 'in care' part of an ever fragmenting society. The first case trial was in Rochdale in Greater Manchester; the disclosures of which were appalling, but almost understandable due to the inflow of immigrants over recent decades. The second, however, is just astounding; with this disgraceful sleaze occurring in the typically English home of one of our great universities, Oxford. Again, a group of Muslim men coerced young white girls into a life of prostitution, with one particular difference, although most of the girls were in care, one was from a normal family. Evidently, her parents had approached the authorities, with plenty of proof, soiled clothing etc., but were completely ignored. All of this disgusting activity going on 'neath the spires of this historical zenith of suburbia.

So what has gone wrong with the British approach to basic decency? The answer, I'm convinced, is this pursuit of things PC. The startling situation in Oxford might well be due to the fact that the authorities, both Police and Social Services, are headed by women. I know from experience, that women in general enjoy the naivety of political correctness. There are, of course, many men in these positions with similar attitudes, who were selected because of their lenient views, possibly due to a diverse sexuality; discipline being something considered to be too right wing.

ARE LESSONS BEING LEARNED? OF COURSE NOT.

SOMETHING ELSE WORTH A REFERENDUM.

The weekly diet on this week's edition of 'Question Time' was surprisingly short of the mandatory 'pantomime question', but it included, and maybe correctly, a question regarding the bill going through Parliament on same sex marriage.

The author has written on the subject in the past. Homosexuality and lesbianism has been with us, presumably, since life began, and it has been ridiculed, unfairly, for far too long. In my weekly radio programme featuring old, proper songs, I mention regularly how often the excellent song writers were/are of diverse sexuality. In the past, it has driven some to a miserable existence, which has ended with, if not tragedy, certainly misery.

Conversely, I don't understand what such a law would do for the community as a whole. When same sex couples decide to live together, which is now fairly commonplace, protected in civil law, why can't we drop the subject and get on with more pressing business. There are plenty of things to consider, particularly the  question of the European Union.

The aforementioned programme tossed this 'hot potato' at the panel, most of whom, as one would expect, ran with the pro-lobby; expressing a kind of delight in recommending such relationships to be enshrined in law. One panellist was not happy, and although much of the audience appeared to be for such arrangements, the most convincing argument came from the antis, people after my own heart. What was appalling, was the fact that the chairman suggested that, because the pros in the audience were vociferous in their outbursts, this would be the consensus throughout the nation. Most of us know that anything produced by the BBC would have placements by the score, to suit their point of view. Furthermore, why is it that only a few of my friends and associates find it acceptable, when the vast majority consider it to be abhorrent? Let us therefore ask the people.


TAKING ON NATURE IS A FOOL'S GAME.

THE JEWISH CONTRIBUTION TO THE 20th. CENTURY.

The title of this piece is that of the book by the same title, by Alan Symons. A few years ago, speaking to a young relation who was embarking on a university course, I advised him to ignore the left wing rhetoric he would hear from some of his lecturers; they seem to think that part of their job is to influence the students into a 'pinko' type of thinking.

For some years, some of Britain's top universities have been sacking many a Jewish Professor from his or her post because of Israel's conflict with the Palestinians. Of course there are concerns when one receives news of such flare-ups and, unfortunately, there are casualties caused by such incidents on both sides. These elite seats of learning, like all 'guardianistas', vilify Israel for retaliatory actions to defend themselves. We need to bear in mind, that Israel is the only open democracy in the area, and is far more thoughtful towards its people than any of its near neighbours. What is particularly disappointing, is that the eminent scholar, Professor Stephen Hawkins, has joined the ranks of these intolerant despicable characters, whose activity must be tantamount to fascist. Hitler would be impressed.

The publication mentioned can be substantiated by a further book, this one by Steve Maltz, 'The People Of Many Names', from which one gleans the input by Jews in so many fields, none more so than that of medicine, where endless vaccines and practises were created via Jewish science. Even the advanced technique which enables Professor Hawkins to communicate is due to Jewish digital technology.

SHOULD WE FEAR A NEW WAVE OF ANTI-SEMITISM?

UKIP IS COMING, UKIP IS COMING!

In the last week, England and Wales have been to the polls for the County Council elections. The usual protest from the dim left regarding the standard of living, which is getting lower due to their disastrous years in office. However, we have a robust political party making considerable headway, The United Kingdom Independence Party, although it would appear that local elections are a strange place for a party resolved to getting Britain out of the European Union; nevertheless, under the inspired leadership of Nigel Farage, a formidable performer in the Brussels Parliament, see Youtube. They are offering proper conservative policies. Apart from our independence from Europe, they would bring back Grammar Schools; create a flat rate regarding income tax, and distance us from  the Human Rights Rulings. Such things obviously struck a chord in these local polls.

Naturally, there is always a downside on these occasions, as Labour won the overall control of our local county, Nottinghamshire. We have had a very efficient Conservative Council led by the excellent Kay Cutts, a type of Margaret Thatcher, holding down local taxes, and demanding central government to improve a major arterial road to serve Nottingham. We can only assume that most locals want a return to increased taxes, not overlooking possible financial assistance for Nottingham City Council and the loss-making tram network. Such funding was thrown out of court by Kay Cutts. As she rightly pointed out, the people in the north of the county would be subscribing to something that they would not use.

The other success for the left was the return of a Labour regime in Derbyshire, which was acknowledged by the local BBC station by asking the new Leader of the council what she had in mind, to which her reply was that her first act would be to ensure that all council employees would receive a 'living wage', current Labour jargon, so as to be able to circulate more money in the local economy; as expected, the simpering reporter never thought of asking from where they would acquire this money. Bring back Alan Whicker.

NEXT FIXTURE: EURO ELECTIONS 2014.