THE JUDICIARY + TERRORISM Vs LOGIC.

As a child growing up during WWII, generally in my East Midlands environment, apart from rare aerial attacks, we felt secure. What has become intriguing, therefore, is why there is now far more danger on the streets of Britain than was the case in those earlier years? Well, it's because we have created a demonic situation, whereby the criminal is defended vehemently by the law of the land, which incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights.

When that 'political tart' Tony Blair, signed up to this charter, which gave his barrister wife 'a nice little earner', he created a whole new industry in the field of law. Unfortunately, this runs counter to lowering the National Debt, by paying out millions in fees to the practitioners in law; a tab picked up by taxpayer GB, if not now, later.

Probably the whole world is aware that we cannot deport the terror suspect Abu Qatada, due to his 'human rights'. The judiciary sees this as being far more important than the rest of society which has to keep picking up the bill, not only for the court hearings, but for the thousands of pounds in benefits.

Only socialism could come up with such a scheme.

WE WERE MUCH SAFER UNDER THE PREVIOUS SYSTEM.