BARACK'S BLARNEY vs MITT'S MONEYSPINNING.

It would appear from the brief excerpt seen on British newscasts of the second of the TV debates leading up to the forthcoming Presidential Election, that the gloves were truly off. The President is so obviously in a corner, he now needs to lash out with personal attacks. Unfortunately, nobody will ever take a step back to review the situation.

Obama's socialist theories will only cost money. Take the model of  British history since the end of WWII in 1945. The dim Brits were jealous of the US, because their servicemen seemed to have too much money, and were sold the theory of socialism/communism. This led to a programme of the nationalisation of major industries, which ultimately, all withered on the vine because of their control by the unions. We imported, what the unions wanted, a cheaper form of labour. This was explained to me by my father, he having been a union official until the late thirties; retiring, due to the leadership's insistence of a lower strata of labour; leaving us with a serious over population problem. The overcrowding has left Britain with massive concerns regarding 'Health and Education'. Increased population has also created a housing problem, with building being spread across 'Green belt'; this is agricultural land, which also doubles as flood plain in many areas.

Some of the aforementioned won't concern the US, particularly the land aspect. Believe this, however, anything that appears to be going for free, 'Health and Education' is a big magnet; and will cost you dearly.

Socialist get a real 'buzz' from giving other peoples' money away, and Obama is no different. If the people of the US want another four years of even more debt, stick with the waster that you know.

ON THE OTHER HAND, ROMNEY KNOWS HOW TO MAKE MONEY.